Pyrexx Smoke/heat detector
Currently out of stock
Product details
The long-term smoke and heat detectors equipped with radio can be easily networked together and react simultaneously when the alarm is triggered. Suitable for particularly large and multi-storey houses
or apartments. The device bridges radio distances of over 400 m (+/-10%) in the open field and has a repeater function. This allows alarms to be perceived even in distant rooms.
| Hazard detector type | Heat detector, Smoke detectors |
| Alarm signal | Acoustic warning |
| Sound power level | 85 dB |
| Power supply | Battery operated |
| Item number | 12582438 |
| Manufacturer | |
| Category | |
| Release date | 27.1.2020 |
| Colour group | White |
| Hazard detector type | Heat detector, Smoke detectors |
| Alarm signal | Acoustic warning |
| Sound power level | 85 dB |
| Radio range | 400 m |
| Power supply | Battery operated |
| Smart Home | Not compatible |
| Height | 3.80 cm |
| Weight | 1 kg |
Specifications may include unverified machine translations.
Reviews & Ratings
Statutory warranty score
How often does a product of this brand in the «Hazard detectors» category have a defect within the first 24 months?
Source: Galaxus- 9.Cordes0,3 %
- 9.Pentatech0,3 %
- 9.Pyrexx0,3 %
- 9.Unitec0,3 %
- 13.Bosch Smart Home0,4 %
Statutory warranty case duration
How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?
Source: Galaxus- PyrexxNot enough data
- 1.Abus0 days
- 1.Brennenstuhl0 days
- 1.EQ-30 days
- 1.Fibaro0 days
Return rate
How often is a product of this brand in the «Hazard detectors» category returned?
Source: Galaxus- 1.Pyrexx0 %
- 2.EQ-30,1 %
- 3.Grundig0,2 %
- 3.Smartwares0,2 %
- 5.Brennenstuhl0,4 %
Source: Galaxus
Translation: machine translated
Stiftung WarentestRauchmelder: Gute Melder ab 20 Euro ? der teuerste im Test versagtReleaseFebruary 2016
In the core point, the reliability of the alarm, the smoke detector performs well, which helps it to achieve an average rating in the final evaluation. Unfortunately, this has to be formulated in such strong terms, as the ratings in the other evaluation points are rather weak. The declaration in particular shows clear deficiencies...