Amazon Fire Max 11 Tablet, 128 GB, Grey, with advertising
WLAN only, 11", 128 GB, GreyCurrently out of stock
Product details
- 11.0-inch IPS display with 2000 x 1200 pixels - 2.2 GHz octa-core MT8188J dual-core processor - 4 GB RAM, 128 GB internal memory, max. memory expandability - 8.0 MP camera, 8.0 MP front camera - WLAN,
BT 4.2 + LE, USB-C, 490 g.
| Operating system | Android |
| Operating System Version | Android 11 |
| Memory | 4 GB |
| Max. picture resolution | 2000 x 1200 pixels |
| Mobile processor | MediaTek |
| USB connector type | USB-C |
| Colour | Grey |
| Item number | 36233746 |
| Manufacturer | |
| Category | |
| Manufacturer no. | B0B2SD451L |
| Release date | 14.6.2023 |
| External links |
| Colour group | Grey |
| Exact colour description | Grey |
| Target group | Adults |
| Operation | Keyboards |
| Touch | Multi-touch |
| Tablet equipment | Integrated loudspeakers |
| Number of speakers | 1 x |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Ambient light sensor, Hall Sensor |
| Unlocking type | Fingerprint |
| Operating system | Android |
| Operating System Version | Android 11 |
| Display size (inches) | 11" |
| Screen technology | LCD |
| Panel technology | IPS |
| Max. picture resolution | 2000 x 1200 pixels |
| Pixel density | 213 dpi |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 / 802.11ax |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 |
| Mobile phone standard | WLAN only |
| Mobile processor | MediaTek |
| Number of processor cores | 8 -Core |
| Processor clock frequency | 2200000000 Hz |
| Camera resolution | 8 Mpx |
| Front camera resolution | 8 Mpx |
| Camera Functions | Autofocus |
| Max. Video resolution rear camera | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
| Memory | 4 GB |
| Storage capacity | 128 GB |
| Memory card type | microSD |
| Max. memory extension | 1000 GB |
| Type of satellite navigation system | GPS |
| USB connector type | USB-C |
| Battery type | Lithium |
| Battery life | 14 h |
| Manufacturer commitment | SBTi |
| Scope of delivery | USB Type-C cable |
| Length | 0.75 cm |
| Width | 16.37 cm |
| Height | 25.91 cm |
| Weight | 720 g |
| Weight | 1 g |
Specifications may include unverified machine translations.
Reviews & Ratings
Statutory warranty score
How often does a product of this brand in the «Tablets» category have a defect within the first 24 months?
Source: Galaxus- 1.Honor0,4 %
- 1.Xiaomi0,4 %
- 3.Amazon0,5 %
- 3.Apple0,5 %
- 5.Google0,7 %
Statutory warranty case duration
How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?
Source: Galaxus- AmazonNot enough data
- 1.Blow1 day
- 1.Oukitel1 day
- 1.Xoro1 day
- 4.Samsung3 days
Return rate
How often is a product of this brand in the «Tablets» category returned?
Source: Galaxus- 11.Krüger&Matz5,7 %
- 12.Xoro6,1 %
- 13.Amazon6,8 %
- 14.OnePlus7,4 %
- 15.Huawei8,3 %
Source: Galaxus
Translation: machine translated
Overall ratingVery good86/100
Very good80/100
- Very good screen
- Optional keyboard and stylus
- Good handwriting recognition
- Good performance
- Limited selection of apps
- No Google
Samsung is deservedly at the top with its new trio. Very high speed, brilliant displays and good battery runtimes: All three models offer almost everything you would expect from a tablet. But the competition is also getting bigger: Google is celebrating a successful return with the Pixel tablet...
Very good80/100
- Overall good performance
- Beautiful, large display
- Keyboard cover and stylus are a success in themselves
- Fire OS user interface not suitable for working
- Missing productivity apps
- Little RAM
- Bright
- true colour display
- Long battery life
- Expandable memory
- Working speed somewhat slow
- Built-in memory is tight
Very good83/100
- Good mid-range performance
- Bright display
- Solid camera
- Very good battery life
- Expandable with pen and keyboard
- Lame memory
Good70/100
- Good value for money
- Can also be set up as a children's tablet
- Memory is expandable
- With keyboard and pen suitable for school, university or work
- Aspect ratio in landscape format not ideal for productivity
- Performance rather poor in comparison with more expensive models